Army’s 2004-19 Operational Camouflage pattern. What emerged was CADPAT/MARPAT, America’s UCP, which you might know as the U.S. This, they hoped, would result in an effective all-in one pattern.
The Americans had the idea that they would take the colour scheme that performed best in each scenario and combine them into a single pattern. A total of four camouflage patterns were selected for testing in the three scenarios-woodland, desert, and urban-under day and night conditions. That year and continuing until 2004, the Americans investigated potential replacements for their then-active Woodland and Desert camouflage uniforms. military’s Universal Camouflage Pattern (UCP, for short). There’s more to this dance than meets the eye.įor proof, let’s step back in time to the year 2002 and look at the effort to develop the U.S. Spoiler alert: you would be wrong to think that. So you might think that creating a new pattern variation is a “fire and forget” deal where you take the geometry, slap on a new colour scheme, and-voila-a new MultiCam variant is born. It so happens that the base geometry of MultiCam does this quite well.
In the case of camouflage, geometrical design serves the purpose of breaking the wearer’s outline at closer distances. MultiCam’s variations weren’t easily createdĪ pattern's geometrical design is like the foundation of a building. And, indeed, they are-despite sharing the original MultiCam’s shortcoming of effective blending at longer distances. Given how well it performs, you’d naturally expect the newer MultiCam versions to be just as versatile. That’s why it’s called the “80-percent solution” for most environments. The original MultiCam pattern is known for its versatility. But all are united around a common theme, and that is to make the MultiCam family appealing as an overall solution. However, each variation is designed for maximum effectiveness in a specific environment.ĭifferent versions, yes. All are based on an identical geometrical design. There currently are five versions of MultiCam. Breakdown of MultiCam’s four added versions.MultiCam’s variations weren’t easily created.Moreover, there is not a single female soldier in Azov. According to Russian Telegram channels, he has already died.Īpart from that, it was reported at the briefing that there is not a single woman with the rank of colonel among the Azov soldiers. It is a low-quality, hastily made fake."ĭetails: The Azov soldier revealed that he has found his own personal information in propagandist social media groups.
So Russians found this document and are now passing it off as a "Yarosh business card". Quote: "This is this woman’s old ID which was just lying around somewhere in the archives at the 3057 military unit site in Mariupol. We have launched English Twitter! Follow us!ĭetails: According to the Ukrainian defender, the official ID exhibited by propagandists could have been found in some military unit in occupied Mariupol: "If we look carefully at what is written on her ID in pencil, we will see that the ID was altered because she got married". And it is stated on her official ID that she is the soldier of the 3057 military unit of the National Guard of Ukraine.Ī separate Azov special forces squad belongs to the 3057 military unit of the National Guard of Ukraine, but not everyone who is in service in the 3057 military unit is an Azov soldier, and this woman is not an Azov soldier either." The woman in the news is dressed in the dress uniform of the National Guard of Ukraine. You can check this piece of news right now. All our documents contain photos of us dressed in the MultiCam uniform. The documents provided by the opponents belong to a person who is not a soldier of the Azov Regiment.
0 kommentar(er)
